8.29.2006

Did He Just Say What I Think He Did?

So here's a question I want to pose to you all. It's a thinker, and it may not make sense right away. But hopefully it will by the time this post is over.

Where is meaning found?

I'm thinking specifically in forms of communication, such as conversing, writing, body language, semaphore, smoke signals, monks doodling on grains of rice, you get the idea. It's common knowledge that communication can be misinterpreted.

Example.

The Apostle Paul frequently exhorts his audience to greet each other with a holy kiss. A common greeting in those times, socially acceptable as a salutation or farewell. Completely platonic with no strings attached, frequently practiced between members of the same sex. No biggie at all.

Fast-forward 2000 years.

Someone today reads what Paul says, and thinks: "What a great idea! A platonic kiss is a long-lost tradition of expressing love to our brothers and sisters in Christ. I should bring it back." And so our idealistic, albeit naive, friend charges into society and begins to attempt to platonically kiss friends, starting with those of the opposite sex because it feels simpler and less awkward. Once again, let us assume that our friend has the purest of motives.

But something goes wrong. For the most part, people don't like having random kisses foisted upon them, platonic or otherwise. Particularly not if the relationship is casual, or a mere acquaintance. Rumors begin to swirl around our friend, questioning motives, whispering half-truths, and utterly thwarting any hope for reinstating this ancient custom. Dejected, defeated, and disheartened, our friend can only retreat, wondering what went wrong.

Miscommunication. Misinterpretation. Misunderstanding.

Our friend had an intended meaning. A simple kiss, a gesture of love between friends. Nothing more.

The ones being kissed had an understood meaning. This is a sign of romantic love, of something-more-than-platonic-affection. And no amount of explaining could shake this understanding.

So to the totally objective outsider... What did the kiss really mean? Who was right? Should our friend be labeled a creep? Or should the rest of society loosen up a little? Who decides what the kiss really means, the kissee or the kisser? Who's to say?

So what about the Bible? Did the Apostle Paul have a definite meaning in mind when he was dictating all those letters to churches across the Roman Empire? Is the meaning Paul intended the only possible meaning his words can have?

Or can we, reading his words thousands of years later, take something from what he said that he didn't intend to say? And if we can... Are we justified in doing so?

It may be a profound truth. It could be a deep insight.

It might also be something that Paul never meant to say. In fact, perhaps he would even be appalled if he knew that people were interpreting his letter in such a way.

Who can say?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The kisser!!! ;)

Just a thought - why didn't you post this on your xanga? I'm pretty sure more people know about that than this blog, and you'd probably get a more well-rounded comment base than just a single biased Canadian who likes to buck social norms. Just a thought.

Anonymous said...

In reality though, I guess it's the age-old battle between intent and impact. I think Paul exhorted people the greet each other with a holy kiss, because in that time and age, a holy kiss was a greeting that expressed deep love and appreciation for one's brothers/sisters in Christ. I think that was his intent - not so much for people to greet people with a *kiss*, per se...but to greet our brothers and sisters in a way that lets them know that you deeply love and appreciate them. I guess the misunderstanding comes in when certain think that a kiss is still a wonderful way to get this across when, in reality, very few people share such a person's sentiments in these modern times. Is that sad? I think so, but then again, this same Paul exhorts his readers not to do anything that would cause those weaker in the faith not to stumble. Does the guy mean the kiss platonically? Yes. But does that mean others will take it that way? No, and therefore, he should bow to their wish to be greeted in not such a societally unorthodox way. That's probably why he took a back seat on the issue. ;) hahaha

The whole thing was an incredibly interesting and intriguing study into modern society's psychological make-up, though.